![how to install glibc ubuntu how to install glibc ubuntu](https://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/install12.png)
- How to install glibc ubuntu software#
- How to install glibc ubuntu mac#
- How to install glibc ubuntu windows#
Most people learn windows and have little incentive to switch. Things are inherently unfamiliar when switching to new platforms. The same is true of both windows and OSX too. Some of the tasks they found easier on linux, whereas some they found easier on windows.
How to install glibc ubuntu software#
Granted, a lot of the windows software users are familiar with on windows isn’t available for linux, but that’s less about linux itself and more about software availability for linux. Many of the tasks had to do with using new applications for things like office, PDF. The one guy had a terminal open showing “top”, but that’s because he thought it was a useful to see and not because he actively used it.
![how to install glibc ubuntu how to install glibc ubuntu](https://i2.wp.com/gamblisfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ubuntu-14-04-install-3.jpg)
Well I watched it now and they didn’t use the terminal for any tasks.
How to install glibc ubuntu mac#
How Linux versions of apps are crashing at many times the rate of Windows or Mac versions (LTT even mentions this in his latest attempt to use Linux as a daily driver), etc. For an average user using a browser and office apps, it’s easy enough to get by without a terminal. If you want to customize things beyond what the OS has configuration wizards for, then sure you’ll go under the hood, but that’s to be expected. But…I find the reasoning that all linux users have to use terminals is exaggerated. Software availability can be a good reason to stick with windows. This isn’t windows versus linux so much as GUI software versus terminal software. While a lot of linux software is terminal based, that same software would require the console running on windows and mac PCs too. Many users get by without ever touching a terminal.
![how to install glibc ubuntu how to install glibc ubuntu](https://helpdeskgeek.com/wp-content/pictures/2022/07/how-to-install-and-use-bash-on-windows-11-2-compressed.jpg)
To be fair, it really depends what you do though. We’d see how often apps fail to start, how often users are forced to use the terminal (yes, I’m aware most of you are in a facebook like echo chamber where you tell each other users never need to use it, but that’s easily disproven by browsing new user help forums for 5 minutes.) We’d see how often apps fail to start, how often users are forced to use the terminal (yes, I’m aware most of you are in a facebook like echo chamber where you tell each other users never need to use it, but that’s easily disproven by browsing new user help forums for 5 minutes.), how Linux versions of apps are crashing at many times the rate of Windows or Mac versions (LTT even mentions this in his latest attempt to use Linux as a daily driver), etc. If we were to start objectively measuring DESKTOP RELIABILITY, then we’d see some god awful numbers explaining why it’s never the year of desktop Linux.
![how to install glibc ubuntu how to install glibc ubuntu](https://blog.tuxcare.com/hubfs/cve-2021-38604.jpg)
The Linux KERNEL is reliable, however the community often conflates that with whether the desktop is reliable. Even with these static linking app packaging methods, it’s still not comparable to the reliability of the baseline OS and SDKs provided by everyone else for running 3rd party software. The Linux desktop is definitely headed towards distros getting all their apps in flatpack (Fedora Silverblue) or Snap (Ubuntu). “but it seems impenetrable for a newcomer or outsider to get into it.”īecause this is the rabbit hole of trying to fix package managers, dependencies, and the problems they create by creating more problems.